I haven’t bothered to read Fauci’s supposedly incriminating emails, because I don’t really care about his opinion and whether he lied.
I already knew he’s a government-supremacist and as such can’t be trusted. Did anyone not know this?
The government-supremacists who are right-statists are celebrating the emails, saying they show he was lying all along. The government-supremacists who are left-statists are either ignoring the emails, or are saying they see nothing incriminating in them.
So, just more of the same from all those people who put politics over truth. They can be ignored since they can’t think outside their box and add nothing to what is known.
Government-supremacists see nothing wrong with lying (or killing) to prop up the state– at least the kind of state they want. To them, it’s for the “greater good”.
This hasn’t changed in my lifetime and I doubt it ever will.
Even if there were nothing in those emails I would disagree with, and no politics disguised as “science” for the gullible, I still don’t trust Fauci. It’s not about one thing he said or did, it’s about his approach to life. His actions show he places the collective State above the good of individuals. Of course, he’ll frame this as the collective State being good for individuals.
Instead of saying “There’s a new cold virus, it seems to be slightly more dangerous than others, and here are some things you might consider doing to protect yourself, but we really don’t know much for sure yet“, he went all … well, government-supremacist… on society. Advocating mandates and rules; encouraging using government violence against those who didn’t do what he thought they should– or at least giving rulers the excuses they needed to do those things without any pushback from him.
Now some are saying the emails are new evidence he lied to get the response he wanted to the narrative he was selling, and that he did other wrong things, too.
Would it be surprising to find out he did? Not to me. He’s political, and ALL politics– all statism– is based on lies and doing wrong. Why would this be the exception?
Why would I read through lots of someone’s emails– or see someone else’s biased (that’s not a criticism, just reality) interpretation of them– to find out that nothing in them is going to make a difference to me one way or the other?
But that’s just me. Others may be more interested and might have good reasons to be. If you want to read through those emails and tell me your impression, go ahead. Maybe I’m just wrong. Maybe there’s something in there that you’ll find and think I should know because it might change my mind and how I live my life. Stranger things have happened.