The Optimal Level of Government Intervention

Neoclassical economists have made many studies of various aspects of what they call “the optimal level of government intervention in the economy.”

All of these studies are highly problematic, mainly because they presume that the existence of a coercive, imposed type of governance (as opposed to one based on voluntary, individual contracting) is a net benefit in the first place.

I dispute this assumption, on the grounds that the government’s imposition of its rule ipso facto demonstrates that it is an arrangement that benefits some at the expense of others — that is, an arrangement for bullying and plundering the ruled for the sake of the rulers and their cronies.

Once this reality is acknowledged, the foundation for determinations of “optimal government intervention” more or less evaporates. The optimal level of government as we know it is zero. No such government, no such intervention.

Save as PDFPrint

Written by 

Robert Higgs is Senior Fellow in Political Economy at the Independent Institute and Editor at Large of the Institute’s quarterly journal The Independent Review. He received his Ph.D. in economics from Johns Hopkins University, and he has taught at the University of Washington, Lafayette College, Seattle University, the University of Economics, Prague, and George Mason University. He has been a visiting scholar at Oxford University and Stanford University, and a fellow at the Hoover Institution and the National Science Foundation.

Notify of

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments