While I’ve spoken about this many times, it keeps coming up so I figured I would do a formal analysis. I’m well-aware this will have no impact on those who use this tactic to avoid discussion, such as lawyers and bureaucrats; this is for those who may be victims of this pernicious method of shouting down a valid argument. Ironically, as will be shown, it’s those screeching “frivolous” that are usually raising a truly frivolous argument. Yelling frivolous is a distraction technique, don’t be fooled by it.
Congrats to William for defending himself and getting a criminal complaint kicked out. Instead of providing the evidence to support their claims, the prosecution dropped the charges. If they had evidence proving their claims of jurisdiction and the laws were violated, then they would have provided the evidence.
Getting traffic tickets sucks and defending yourself in court is a daunting task, but can be well worth the effort. You can be held in contempt for asking a question and let’s face it, traffic courts are run by criminals who are not interested in being fair. But, despite that, we still get tickets thrown out. Below are five proven tips to help you be more effective in court.
Four charges, one that started as a felony, dismissed in New York. A big congrats and thanks for letting me post this. It is redacted because the defendant asked me, and the file is sealed.
A listener got a traffic ticket kicked out on appeal in Delaware. Yes, it was a parking ticket, but we’re making the same challenges we do in more serious charges, such as personal jurisdiction. Everything was just ignored at the trial, this is typical with parking tickets. So an appeal was done and the motion to dismiss was again filed. As you can see above, the ticket was voided.
Congrats to Lorenzo for defending himself against the predators in Florida and getting a dismissal. While there is no direct evidence the failure of the judge and prosecutor to respond in eight months to the motion to dismiss and discovery request led to the dismissal, I don’t think we can totally discount that.
There are no major charges this time, but all code violations and those are the same as serious code violations. The prosecution is making the same basic claims, such as claiming the laws apply just because you’re physically in Utah. That is the basis of personal and subject matter jurisdiction and the prosecution has no evidence to prove it.
Cheril had no evidence of jurisdiction, no evidence even suggesting Bao was psychologically unsound; she imprisoned Bao as a punishment for daring to challenge the prosecution’s claims and the proceedings against him. Cheril is a criminal whose actions clearly demonstrate that she has psychological issues such as anti-social behavior.
If the prosecution, which live by convictions, had the evidence to support their claim, they would present it. It would be an easy copy and paste on the way to a rubber-stamp conviction. Instead, they now fairly routinely withdraw their frivolous complaints.
Congrats to Brady in California and Ryan in Texas for standing up to the predators and getting dismissals. Thanks for the documentary proof.