No Clue

I heard a Federal Government bureaucrat/spokesperson on the radio on my way to work this morning.  An amount of hot air was gushed that would make a political hack blush.  The bureau in question was the Department for Homeland Security (you know, the wholly fictitious entity which was created by the equally fictitious War on Terror).

That Which is Not Seen

Bastiat and Hazlitt have such good arguments for the long term and the not seen, that we may make the mistake of denigrating the short term and the seen. The true caution, however, is that neither — short or long, seen or unseen — should be viewed as independent of the other.

Jobs and AI

I am a survivor of the Expert Systems rage of the mid-80s.  Every trade journal of every industry that even had a trickle of data processing was touting the next coming of Expert Systems.  ES were premised on taking the most experienced, most expert of your business’s humans, then making a killer app with your tiny desktop computers that would cross-examine your clerks to make sure they answered all of the questions that your top guru would ask. 

System-Bound III

I was thinking, a few weeks ago, as I was approaching Chicago from Northern Indiana, a jumble of converging and diverging routes, that the last thing I needed was some electronic message carrying ironic propaganda — it was all I could do to keep from making the wrong turn.  I needed focus, not entertainment.

Forty-Five Horror Stories

This morning, an online friend responded to my latest rant about the current edition of POTUS, by questioning how many years — or decades — it would take to recover from the current administration.  I hold no such optimistic view.  I generally consider the office of POTUS to be a carbuncle on the derriere of human achievement.  No such source of grief ever goes away, it merely subsides among many sources.

Perfect in What Sense? II

Once I read in a forgotten novel or a forgotten review of a forgotten novel that one character described another as able to identify and illuminate the least distinguished facet of any set of circumstances. I am reminded of this when I hear of POTUS’s latest tweet recounting the attack on Syria as “perfectly executed.”

Perfect in What Sense?

POTUS has a disturbing tendency to use more hyperbole with an inverse relationship to the likelihood of outcomes. He tweets that strikes on Syria were “perfectly executed,” when the reality is that execution has nothing to do with how the events will affect the history of humankind. “The operation was a success but the patient died.” “The cop gunned down 12 dogs, but he followed procedure to the letter.”

Tell the Truth

Mark Twain wrote, “When in doubt, tell the truth.”  That seems, on its face, to be simple enough, but what does it mean?  We live in a land of lawyers, where what is the truth becomes more and more a matter for speculation.  POTUS has labeled a whole genre of purported information as “Fake News.”  But what does that mean?  Does it mean news that he doesn’t like, or does it mean misinformation for which determinate  proof of falsity exists?